Tokyo Court Rules North Korea Lured Japanese With State Propaganda, Forced Them Into Labor And Orders Pyongyang To Pay Compensation
Image: 朝日新聞

Tokyo Court Rules North Korea Lured Japanese With State Propaganda, Forced Them Into Labor And Orders Pyongyang To Pay Compensation

27 January, 2026.North Korea.3 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Tokyo court orders North Korea to pay 88 million yen to four lured migrants
  • Pyongyang's state propaganda marketed North Korea as a 'paradise', enticing migrants to relocate
  • Plaintiffs endured harsh conditions and were coerced into forced labor in North Korea

Compensation for forced repatriation

The plaintiffs say they were lured from Japan decades ago by a state-backed resettlement propaganda campaign and then subjected to harsh conditions including forced labor.

Image from BBC
BBCBBC

The ruling was described as historic but largely symbolic because Pyongyang ignored summonses and there is no practical way to enforce the judgment.

The plaintiffs are part of the larger wave of Zainichi Koreans who moved to North Korea between 1959 and 1984.

Zainichi Koreans' repatriation case

The plaintiffs are among more than 90,000 Zainichi Koreans who moved from Japan to North Korea between 1959 and 1984.

They were encouraged to relocate after being promised a better life, including a 'paradise on Earth' and free healthcare, education and jobs.

Image from 朝日新聞
朝日新聞朝日新聞

Survivors say those promises proved false.

At least one plaintiff, Eiko Kawasaki, who went in 1960, escaped in 2003 and is now 83.

Lawyers representing the plaintiffs called the ruling 'historic', marking the first time a Japanese court has formally recognised North Korean malpractice in this context.

Japanese court case timeline

The case was filed in 2018.

A 2022 Tokyo district court dismissed the claims.

The Tokyo High Court overturned that dismissal in 2023.

The recent judgment formally recognised North Korean wrongdoing.

Judge Taiichi Kamino said the defendants' lives were largely destroyed by North Korea.

Lawyers caution, however, that enforcing payment will be difficult.

North Korea legal non-compliance

Both sources report that North Korea did not respond to the lawsuit or court summonses, leaving the award practically unenforceable.

The BBC explicitly notes that Kim Jong Un has not responded.

Image from 朝日新聞
朝日新聞朝日新聞

İlke highlights the difficulty of collecting damages and frames the ruling as a formal recognition of wrongdoing, even though Pyongyang ignored the process.

Court ruling and survivor impact

The sources differ in emphasis: one highlights the court’s formal recognition and the destruction of lives, while the other stresses the symbolic, unenforceable nature of the award.

Image from BBC
BBCBBC

The lack of a response from Pyongyang means the ruling’s practical effect is limited even as it offers legal acknowledgment for survivors.

More on North Korea